The Supreme Court is hearing arguments about and “seeing shades of 1984” in warrantless GPS tracking. The future of the Fourth Amendment looks a bit bleak in this digital age, says Frida Ghitis. Ghitis: Law enforcement injecting malicious software for remote’search and seizures’ and perhaps a bit on virtual force such as when the government launches DDoS attacks on sites distributing information it does not like being released to the general public (think WikiLeaks) Ghitis says it’s “reasonable” from a legal perspective that peeps in this category would instantly destroy any proof on their box if they thought the feds were flexing virtual force for an online house search.”]