TL;DR
Using only an account number for VPN authentication is extremely risky. It’s easily compromised and offers very little cyber security protection. We’ll cover why, the potential attacks, and how to improve things – even if you can’t fully ditch this system.
Understanding the Problem
VPNs normally use usernames *and* passwords (or more secure methods like certificates). Relying solely on an account number is a significant weakness. Account numbers are often sequential or predictable, making brute-force attacks much easier. They also lack the complexity of a strong password.
Risks & Vulnerabilities
- Brute-Force Attacks: Attackers can systematically try account numbers until they find a valid one. This is faster than guessing passwords.
Example: If account numbers are 6 digits, there are only 1 million possibilities. - Account Enumeration: Attackers might be able to discover valid account number ranges through various methods (e.g., trying different numbers and observing responses).
- Lack of Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA): Without a password, adding MFA is difficult or impossible, leaving you vulnerable even if the account number is known.
- Session Hijacking: If an attacker gains access to your session cookie (e.g., through malware or network sniffing), they can impersonate you without needing the account number.
- Data Breaches: If the VPN provider suffers a data breach, account numbers are much easier for attackers to exploit than hashed passwords.
Advantages (Limited)
There aren’t many real advantages. The main one is simplicity for users – they only need to remember an account number. However, this convenience comes at a huge cyber security cost.
Improving Security – Steps You Can Take
- Implement Rate Limiting: Limit the number of login attempts from a single IP address within a specific timeframe.
Example (using iptables on Linux):iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m recent --name VPN_BRUTEFORCE --set --rsource $SRCIP
iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --dport 22 -m recent --name VPN_BRUTEFORCE --update seconds 60 --hitcount 5 -j DROP(This example is for SSH, adapt the port to your VPN protocol).
- Account Lockout: Temporarily lock accounts after a certain number of failed login attempts.
- IP Address Binding: If possible, restrict access to specific IP addresses or ranges associated with legitimate users. This is difficult for mobile users.
- Geographic Restrictions: Block connections from countries where your users are not expected to connect.
- Monitor Login Attempts: Log all login attempts (successful and failed) and actively monitor them for suspicious activity. Use a SIEM if possible.
- Two-Factor Authentication (2FA) – Even with Account Numbers: Explore options like sending a one-time code to an email address or phone number associated with the account.
This is challenging but crucial. You might need custom development. - Session Timeout: Reduce session timeout periods to minimize the window of opportunity for attackers who may have compromised a session cookie.
- Strong Encryption: Ensure the VPN uses strong encryption protocols (e.g., OpenVPN with AES-256) regardless of authentication method.
- Regular Security Audits: Have a cyber security professional regularly audit your VPN system for vulnerabilities.
If You *Must* Use Account Number Authentication
If you absolutely cannot switch to username/password or other stronger methods:
- Combine with Other Factors: Even a simple check (e.g., verifying the user’s location) can add some protection.
- Educate Users: Warn users about the risks and encourage them to protect their account numbers.
- Consider it Temporary: Treat this as an interim solution while you plan a migration to a more secure authentication system.
Final Thoughts
Account number-only VPN authentication is inherently insecure. Prioritize migrating to a stronger authentication method as soon as possible. The steps above can mitigate some risks, but they are not a substitute for proper cyber security practices.

