Blog | G5 Cyber Security

Man-in-the-Middle Attacks & Certificate Authorities

G5 Cyber Security

TL;DR

Yes, a Certificate Authority (CA) can be defeated by a Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) attack. While CAs are designed to verify ownership before issuing certificates, vulnerabilities in the process – particularly weak validation or successful phishing attacks – allow attackers to obtain legitimate certificates for their own use. This enables them to impersonate websites and intercept encrypted traffic.

How a MitM Attack Can Defeat a CA

  1. Understanding Certificate Authorities: CAs act as trusted third parties, verifying the identity of website owners before issuing digital certificates. These certificates confirm that a website is who it claims to be.
  2. The Vulnerability: Weak Validation: The core issue lies in how the CA validates ownership. Historically, and sometimes still today, validation methods can be weak. Examples include:
    • Email Verification: Relying solely on an email sent to an address listed in WHOIS records. Attackers can often gain control of these email accounts or spoof them.
    • Phone Verification: Using publicly available phone numbers or social engineering to bypass verification.
    • DNS Record Checks: Checking DNS records, which can be manipulated by attackers.
  3. The MitM Attack Process:
    1. Positioning the Attacker: The attacker places themselves between the victim (e.g., a user) and the legitimate website server. This is often done through techniques like ARP poisoning, DNS spoofing, or malicious Wi-Fi hotspots.
    2. Intercepting Traffic: All communication between the victim and the server passes through the attacker’s machine.
    3. Requesting a Certificate: The attacker initiates a certificate signing request (CSR) for the target domain. They present this CSR to a CA.
    4. Exploiting Weak Validation: If the CA’s validation is weak, the attacker can successfully convince the CA they are the legitimate owner of the domain. 
      openssl req -new -keyout key.pem -out csr.pem -subj "/CN=example.com"
    5. Receiving the Certificate: The CA issues a valid certificate to the attacker, signed with their root key.
    6. Presenting the Fake Certificate: The attacker configures their server (or proxy) to use the fraudulently obtained certificate. 
      openssl x509 -req -days 365 -in csr.pem -signkey key.pem -out cert.pem
    7. Decrypting and Intercepting Traffic: When the victim connects to what they believe is the legitimate website, the attacker presents their fake certificate. Because it’s signed by a trusted CA, the victim’s browser accepts it.
      1. The attacker can now decrypt the traffic using the private key associated with the fraudulent certificate.
      2. They can steal sensitive information like passwords, credit card details, and personal data.
  4. Phishing Attacks: Attackers may directly target CA employees or domain owners with phishing emails to obtain credentials or trick them into approving fraudulent certificate requests.

Preventing MitM Attacks & Protecting Against CA Exploitation

  1. Stronger Validation Processes (for CAs): Implement multi-factor authentication for account access, rigorous domain control validation methods (e.g., DNS TXT records), and thorough vetting of certificate requests.
  2. HSTS (HTTP Strict Transport Security): Enforces HTTPS connections, making it harder for attackers to intercept traffic. 
    Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload
  3. Certificate Transparency (CT): Publicly logs all issued certificates, allowing for detection of fraudulent certificates.
  4. Public Key Pinning: Hardcodes the expected public key of a website into client applications, preventing acceptance of rogue certificates.
    1. This is complex to implement and requires careful management as it can break connections if the certificate changes legitimately.
  5. User Awareness: Educate users about phishing attacks and the importance of verifying website security indicators (e.g., padlock icon, correct domain name).
  6. Regular Security Audits: Conduct regular audits of CA systems and processes to identify and address vulnerabilities.
Exit mobile version