Blog | G5 Cyber Security

Firefox & NoScript vs Chrome Security

TL;DR

For strong security, Firefox with the NoScript extension is generally better than Google Chrome out-of-the-box. Chrome relies heavily on sandboxing and automatic updates, while NoScript gives you fine-grained control over what scripts run in your browser, blocking many threats before they even load. However, it requires more user effort to manage.

1. Understanding the Basics

Both Firefox and Chrome are based on Chromium (though Firefox has its own engine, Gecko). They both offer good baseline security features like phishing protection and malware blocking. The key difference lies in their approach:

2. Why Firefox + NoScript is More Secure

NoScript blocks JavaScript, Java, Flash and other potentially dangerous content by default. This significantly reduces your attack surface.

3. Installing and Configuring NoScript

  1. Install the Extension: Search for “NoScript” in the Firefox Add-ons store (https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/noscript/) and install it.
  2. Initial Setup: When you first visit a website, NoScript will block all scripts. You’ll see a notification bar at the top of the page.
  3. Temporarily Allow Scripts: Click the NoScript icon in your toolbar to temporarily allow scripts for the current session. This is useful for testing if a site works correctly.
  4. Trusting Websites Permanently: If you trust a website, click the NoScript icon and select “Allow” or “Trust”. You can also configure more specific permissions (e.g., allowing only certain domains).

4. Managing NoScript – A Practical Guide

NoScript requires some initial effort to get used to, but it becomes easier with practice.

5. Chrome Security Features

Chrome has several built-in security features:

However, these features are largely automatic. You have less control over what scripts run and how websites behave.

6. Comparing the Approaches

Here’s a quick comparison:

Feature Firefox + NoScript Chrome
Control High – you decide what runs Low – automatic security measures
Effort Higher – requires initial configuration and ongoing management Lower – mostly hands-off
Attack Surface Significantly reduced due to default blocking Larger, relies on sandboxing and detection
Customisation Extensive through extensions like NoScript Limited

7. Conclusion

If you’re willing to invest the time and effort, Firefox with NoScript provides a more secure browsing experience than Chrome out-of-the-box. It gives you greater control over your browser’s behaviour and reduces your risk of falling victim to web-based attacks. Chrome is convenient and offers good baseline security, but it relies heavily on automatic updates and sandboxing.

Exit mobile version